Note. This is a stand-alone report/document page without links. To return to main pages, either close or minimise this window.

House of Commons Gives Cautious 'Thumbs Up' To Trams

The House of Commons Transport Committee gave a catious 'thumbs up' to trams in their report. See Press Release below.

Politicians are sitting on a time bomb by not taking public transport seriously.

Some new trams schemes do have a future in this country, so the Department for Transport had better improve the way it assesses them. This is the key finding of the latest Report of the House of Commons Transport Committee, published today [00:01 3rd April 05].

The committee found that tram schemes could offer clean, high-quality, accessible urban transport on busy routes, despite their initially high capital cost. With enough passengers, trams could be cheaper than buses, and low passengers were not inevitable.

Despite these advantages, it seems to the MPs that the Government no longer wholeheartedly supported trams. The Report says the Department for Transport has failed to give a strategic lead in the development of Light rail in the United Kingdom.

The indecisiveness of the Department, policy differences between Mayor Livingstone and the Greater London Authority and public disagreements between Transport for London and Tramtrack Croydon Ltd [TCL], the consortium that operate the highly successful Croydon Tramlink system; are cited as the reasons for delays in implementing planned extensions to: Sutton, Streatham, Purley, Tooting and Kingston upon Thames.

The Chairman of the committee, Mrs Gwyneth Dunwoody MP, said:

"Trams aren't a magic answer to every transport problem. But they certainly aren't anywhere near as crackpot as some people would have us believe.

The local bodies promoting light-rail schemes now work closely with planning authorities to ensure their schemes provide effective public transport and support regeneration. That wasn't always the case in the past.

Tram schemes cannot simply be written off as too expensive. It is more complex than that: the problems come because the Government takes a long time to make decisions, the private sector is supposed to bear the risks, and then everyone seems surprised that those risks now have a price attached. To cap it all, the deregulated bus system outside London prevents local Authorities from ensuring trams lie at the heart of an integrated transport system."

The cost of building new tram systems has escalated hugely. MPs were told that building a light rail scheme in the United Kingdom could cost an astronomical 60% more than building one somewhere else in Europe.

The committee found that these costs were caused by:

It no longer being possible to transfer revenue risks to the private sector without greatly increasing costs;

The committee's Report recommends that:

Notes for editors: 1. Contacts should be made to: David Cockle, Director Light Rail Transit Association [LRTA] Council: 07702 720766: Christine Seaman, Director South London Partnership & South London Tram Group: 0208 726 0175

June 2005

Note. This is a stand-alone report/document page without links. To return to main pages, either close or minimise this window.